Skip to main content

Racquet Sport Prize Money: Disparity Across Tennis, Badminton, and TT

prize money
BadmintonTennisTable Tennis

Explore the massive prize money gap across tennis, badminton, and table tennis. See why elite athletes face huge deficits despite identical tour costs.

A public exchange between 2 time Olympic medalist PV Sindhu and sports commentator Kannan brought the financial realities of elite racquet sports into sharp focus. Following reporting by Mihir Vasavda in The Indian Express regarding Sports Authority of India (SAI) administrative delays that disrupted athlete travel, Kannan publicly questioned why established badminton stars cannot fund their own tours like professional tennis players. Sindhu dismantled the comparison by exposing the massive structural revenue divide between the two sports. While international flights, hotel accommodations, coaching salaries, and sports science support remain identical across disciplines, the underlying prize money ecosystems differ completely. Athletes competing in badminton and table tennis face commercial structures that make tour self sufficiency virtually impossible without institutional backing.

https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/badminton/sports-authority-of-india-badminton-funding-cut-pv-sindhu-lakshya-sen-10947912/

Tournament Prize Money: A Direct Cross Sport Comparison

The compensation gap becomes clear when examining prize payouts across equivalent tournament tiers in tennis, badminton, and table tennis:

  • Major Tournaments: 

    • At Wimbledon 2024, singles champions earned £2,700,000, while a first round exit received £60,000, which is approximately $78,000. 

    • In badminton, the richest tournament on the tour, the $2,000,000 China Open 2024, awarded $140,000 to singles champions and just $2,000 to first round exits.

    • In table tennis, the $1,500,000 Singapore Smash 2024 awarded $60,000 to the singles champion and $5,000 to opening round exits in the round of 64. 

      A player losing in the opening round at Wimbledon collects nearly 40 times more than an opening round departure at badminton's premier tournament.

  • Tier 2 Events: 

    • At Indian Wells 2024, an ATP and WTA 1000 tournament, singles champions collected $1,100,000, and first round main draw departures received $30,050. 

    • In contrast, badminton Super 750 events such as the French Open and Denmark Open offer total event purses between $850,000 and $1,100,000, paying singles champions roughly $66,500 to $77,000 while first round losers receive under $1,000. 

    • In table tennis, World Table Tennis Champions tournaments feature purses between $300,000 and $500,000, awarding winners roughly $35,000 and first round losers $4,250.

      Still a massive divide

  • Annual Earnings of Dominant Champions: 

    • Top 5 tennis players routinely secure between $8,000,000 and $15,000,000 annually in prize money alone. 

    • In badminton, sweeping the international circuit yields a fraction of that figure. In 2023, world champions Viktor Axelsen and An Se Young dominated their tours, winning several titles, yet collected $645,095 and $628,020 respectively. 

    • In table tennis, world number 1 Wang Chuqin topped the men's prize money list in 2024 with approximately $261,000.

https://www.indiasportshub.com/articles/pv-sindhu-wins-hylo-open-2026-claims-second-bwf-world-tour-title-of-the-season

Tour Operating Overheads and the Top 100 Solvency Threshold

These disparate reward structures confront fixed operating costs that do not scale down for lower earning sports:

  • Baseline Travel and Lodging: A competitive campaign requires 20 to 25 weeks of international travel. Flights, accommodation, and per diems for an athlete, traveling coach, and trainer average between $50,000 and $80,000 annually.

  • Coaching and Support Staff: Employing a dedicated coach costs $40,000 to $100,000 per year, while on site physiotherapists and trainers add $25,000 to $50,000. Routine equipment maintenance, restringing, and medical care add $10,000 to $20,000, driving total annual expenses to between $120,000 and $250,000.

  • Financial Viability in the Top 100: 

    • A tennis player ranked 75 who exits in the first round of all 4 Grand Slams earns roughly $300,000, comfortably covering tour expenses. 

    • Conversely, a badminton player ranked between 50 and 100 earns between $20,000 and $40,000 in gross annual prize money, covering less than 25% of necessary tour expenses. 

    • In table tennis, top 100 players rarely generate more than $15,000 to $30,000 on tour, relying instead on domestic club salaries in European leagues or China.

Without institutional support from bodies like SAI or non profit organizations like Olympic Gold Quest, emerging players operate at a steep financial deficit.

2026 earnings
Player Images - Google News & Images

Gender Parity and Underlying Commercial Drivers

The commercial disparity between these sports stems from broadcast reach and sponsorship profiles:

  • Gender Prize Money Equity: Badminton and table tennis offer 100% prize money parity between men and women across all World Tour and WTT events. In badminton, 11 of the top 20 prize money earners in 2023 were female shuttlers, led by An Se Young. Tennis provides equal prize money across all 4 Grand Slams and combined 1000 tournaments like Indian Wells, though pay gaps persist in standalone lower tier events.

  • Broadcast and Sponsorship Economics: Tennis commands multi billion dollar global television agreements across Europe, North America, and Australia, paired with massive ticket sales and premium corporate hospitality packages. Badminton and table tennis generate immense viewership in Asia, but international broadcast rights monetization remains modest. While tennis attracts major banking, luxury, and automotive brands, badminton and table tennis depend heavily on endemic equipment suppliers like Yonex, Li Ning, and Butterfly, alongside state athletic grants.

The Policy Imperative

Sindhu's response emphasizes an essential structural reality: outside the tennis circuit, professional racquet sport athletes cannot rely on prize money alone to fund their careers. Public funding is not an inefficient subsidy; it is an indispensable investment in sporting talent. Without sustained institutional backing, an aspiring 18 year old athlete cannot survive the financial demands of the professional tour to reach world class contention

Enjoyed this story? A small contribution helps us cover more of Indian sport.₹200+ unlocks 1 year Premium · tap anywhere to paySupport · ₹501

Comments (0)

to post comments, replies, and votes.

GU

Loading comments…

Download the IndiaSportsHub app
Loading related stories…